The Restructuring Debate: Serving Nigerian Elite Interest.
Problems and Prospects of Restructuring Nigeria. Having seen all the above benefits of a decentralized government it is no doubt that Nigerians are desperately calling on the federal government to restructure the country. However some are of the opinion that restructuring is not what the country actually needs at the moment. They believe that Nigeria is not yet ripe for this system of.
The call for the restructuring of Nigeria which in essence is a call for partial or wholesale review of the current 1999 Constitution should be treated under those provisions. It is the perceived.
The Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has explained his stance on restructuring Nigeria’s federal system. Mr. El-Rufai, in a statement by his spokesperson, Samuel Aruwan, said his stance on.
In Nigeria, however, manufacturing accounts for a mere 10% of GDP, and only 12% of the labour force. And Nigeria ranks 127th out of 144 in global competitiveness. And Nigeria ranks 127th out of.
Restructuring Nigeria by devolution of power and the allotment of more resources to our existing irresponsible governors can not enable the average Nigeria to access a much better life; rather, is a death sentence to the suffering masses. Restructuring will not make our political leaders who are more concerned about themselves become responsible rather it will make them worst since they are in.
The recent narratives in the public domain focus on the national issue of Nigeria’s restructuring. This call seems to be highly ratifying as it cuts across every part of the country. There had.
Share the advantages and disadvantages to Nigeria Economy. Restructuring means re-organising, repositioning or re-constituting a body, institution or even a business for better performance. Nigeria should be restructured in the following areas: 1. Federating units (state government) should control their resources. 2. The Federating units should allocate 13% of their revenue to the federal.
Spectrum Books, Nigeria: Format: Paperback: Federalism and Political Restructuring in Nigeria edited by Kunle Amuwo. Twenty essays by four generations of Nigerian scholars are included in this volume, the first to examine the historical, political, economic and comparative dimensions of attempts by the military to restructure the Nigerian federation. Evidence is accumulated in support of the.
In the second part of a three-series of interviews commemorating 57 years of independence from British colonial rule, FairPlanet speaks to two leading advocates of the restructuring movement in Nigeria, either from a region clamouring for greater autonomy. The first is Chidi Odinkalu, the senior legal officer for the Africa Program of the Open Society Justice Initiative. He also served as the.
The national question has remained an intractable challenge to Nigeria’s existence. The debate revolves around the demand for restructuring of the federation and the elaboration of governmental structures in the country. The pattern of restructuring advocated has tended to follow closely the way the national question is framed. Federalism.
At Independence, Nigeria was divided into three self-governing regions: Western, Eastern and Northern. After the first coup in 1966, the military replaced these regions with a stronger central government that made Nigeria easier to govern for them. Despite the return to democracy, power has not yet been fully transferred powers back to sub-nationals, leading to calls for 'restructuring'.
The restructuring of the Nigerian federation is long overdue. For about four years now, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, former Vice-President, has been advocating the need to restructure the Nigerian.
Conversely, those that are averse to the restructuring idea have equally posited that Nigeria has since the First Republic, undergone series of restructuring journeys without commensurate progress. Besides, the country has also failed to consolidate on the gains of restructuring and or making a conscious effort to improve on the challenges.
